Showing posts with label issue: global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label issue: global warming. Show all posts

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Our greed is destroying the world. Make better choices. Think of nature, and others.


If we go on the way we have, the fault is
our greed; and if we are not willing to change,
we will disappear from the face of the globe,
to be replaced by the insect.


Jacques-Yves Cousteau, French naval officer
and oceanographer, born on this date, 1910

Monday, May 17, 2010

April was the hottest on record, ever.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37197396/ns/us_news-environment/

WASHINGTON - The planet's average land and sea temperature for April was 58.1 degrees Fahrenheit (14.5 Celsius), the hottest for any April since recordkeeping began in 1880, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday.

That was 1.37 degrees F (0.76 C) above the 20th Century average of 56.7 degrees F (13.7 C).

Indeed, the world's average temperature was the highest on record for the January-April period, according to NOAA's National Climatic Data Center.


Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Climate Change in the Deep

Climate Change in the Deep

Source: http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/04/climate-change-deep

What happens at the surface doesn't stay at the surface. It seems that changes in Earth's climate can cause unexpectedly large changes in deep-sea ecosystems. Based on 18 years of studies, the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute's Ken Smith and coauthors show that such ecosystem changes occur over short time scales of weeks to months, as well as over longer periods of years to decades. The paper, Climate, carbon cycling, and deep-ocean ecosystems, is in PNAS. From the From the abstract:

"The dependence of deep-sea communities on surface water production has raised important questions about how climate change will affect carbon cycling and deep-ocean ecosystem function. Recently, unprecedented time-series studies conducted over the past two decades in the North Pacific and the North Atlantic at >4,000-m depth have revealed unexpectedly large changes in deep-ocean ecosystems significantly correlated to climate-driven changes in the surface ocean that can impact the global carbon cycle. Climate-driven variation affects oceanic communities from surface waters to the much-overlooked deep sea and will have impacts on the global carbon cycle. Data from these two widely separated areas of the deep ocean provide compelling evidence that changes in climate can readily influence deep-sea processes."

The MBARI video illuminates some of the changes underway in the permanent darkness of the deep sea floor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qblwORXwrg&feature=player_embedded



Share this on Facebook: Share

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

NASA Says: Automobiles Largest Net Climate Change Culprit

NASA Says: Automobiles Largest Net Climate Change Culprit
Written by Zachary Shahan
Published on February 23rd, 2010
Posted in Carbon Emissions, Climate Change, Transportation Tech

Nearly two years ago, I wrote that transportation was “the leading contiributor to greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the country, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and… the fastest growing contributor.”

Now, in other terms and looking at additional factors, NASA has determined that automobiles are the largest net contributor to climate change pollution.

In other words, when you take into account the climate change (or global warming) gases automobiles emit as well as gases they emit that have a cooling effect, automobiles are the largest contributor to climate change, followed by 2) burning of household biofuels (i.e. wood and animal dung) and 3) raising livestock.

PLEASE READ THE FULL ARTICLE:

Friday, December 18, 2009

Steve Howard on our energy-efficient future

Steve Howard on our energy-efficient future
by Amanda Little
16 Dec 2009
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE BELOW

Steve Howard, CEO of the non-partisan nonprofit organization The Climate Group, took some time away from his Copenhagen climate duties to share a tantalizing glimpse into our energy future:

Q. How will our day-to-day lives change if we really do adopt more sustainable energy practices and products?

A. You’ll walk out of a building and you’ll get into your electric vehicle. Your electric vehicle will have been charged, but it won’t have been charged from a coal plant power station. It will be sun from the southwest of the U.S., or it will be wind from the North Sea of the North English coast. You’ll drive home. Your car will tell your house you’re coming just before you get there—so if it’s summer the AC will kick on 15 minutes before you get home. It won’t have been on all day.

You’ll get your daily text message saying how much money you’ve made from the solar installation on the roof, because your solar panels will have been selling electricity to next door’s washing machine, because you have too much power you’ve generated that day.

The lights you’ll have as you walk into the house, they’ll all be LED. Actually they’ll be panels. You won’t even see the lights. There’s no light switches in your room because we’re all really bad at switching light switches off. The lights will switch off automatically when we walk out of a room and they’ll come on just before we walk in because the house will be smart ...

The world will be connected, every product and service will be great. Your fridge will make your life easier. So on your PDA you’ll have a menu recommendation—for the things that [your fridge] knows you like to eat and the things that are available in your fridge. Your fridge will have done some internet shopping for you and it will actually be telling you that you shouldn’t order more of the things that you usually order. And it won’t order them for you. So you’ve eliminated a whole lot of food waste and your diet has improved as well. That’s the future that we’re going towards. We will have eliminated waste, eliminated carbon, and be totally resource efficient. And we’ll have created a whole new wave of jobs.

TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE: http://www.grist.org/article/2009-12-16-steve-howard-on-the-future

EXCELLENT ARTICLE: Only the numbers count—and they add up to hell on earth

Only the numbers count—and they add up to hell on earth
by Bill McKibben
16 Dec 2009
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE BELOW

COPENHAGEN—The Bella Center is a swirl of chatter, the streets of Copenhagen are a swirl of protest. Depending on what hour you listen to the news bulletin, the U.N. climate negotiations have “come off the rails” or are “back on track” or have “stalled” or are “moving swiftly.” Which is why the only people who really understand what’s going on may be a small crew of folks from a group of computer jockeys called Climate Interactive. Their software speaks numbers, not spin—and in the end it’s the numbers that count.

First number to know: 350. It’s what scientists have been saying for two years is the maximum amount of carbon dioxide we can safely have in the atmosphere, measured in parts per million. Those scientists have been joined by an unprecedented outpouring from civil society: in late October, activists put on what CNN called “the most widespread day of political action in the planet’s history,” with 5,200 demonstrations in 181 countries, all rallying around that number. Three thousand vigils last weekend across the planet spelled out the number in candles. Thousands of churches rang their bells 350 times on Sunday, and yesterday the World Parliament of Religions, meeting in Melbourne and representing the “largest interreligious gathering on earth” sent an emergency 350 declaration here to Copenhagen.

The second number: 100. That’s (roughly) how many countries are backing a 350 target here at Copenhagen. That’s more than half the nations in attendance—unfortunately, they’re the small, poor ones. But it’s amazing to see them, in the face of enormous pressure, keeping the idea of real action alive. Yesterday Mohamed Nasheed, president of the Maldives, spoke to a roaring crowd of thousands: “We know what the laws of physics say: the most important number in the world is 350.”


The third number: 4 percent. That’s how much the U.S. is offering to cut its emissions from their 1990 levels by 2020. Scientists tell us that the developed world would need to reduce by at least 40 percent to get us back on a 350 track, so the American offer is exactly an order or magnitude off. And they’re not alone. All the rich countries, not to mention China, are looking to do as little as possible and still escape here with some kind of agreement they can hide behind.

PLEASE READ THE FULL ARTICLE:
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-12-16-only-the-numbers-count-and-they-add-up-to-hell-on-earth

Good for health and reducing global warming

Good for health and reducing global warming
JOHANNESBURG
27 November 2009
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE BELOW

Eat less meat, have smaller herds of animals, switch to more efficient stoves that pollute less, and develop more sustainable public transport systems are some of the lifestyle changes and technical fixes that could save millions of lives and reduce global warming.

This is the message in a series of studies published by a group of scientists in the respected British medical journal, The Lancet, to make a case for health at the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen (COP15), starting on 7 December 2009.

Each study focuses on one sector where greenhouse gas emissions need to be reduced, including household energy use, urban land transport, electricity generation, and food and agriculture. The effect on health of short-lived greenhouse pollutants, produced by several sectors, is also reviewed.

Reducing preventable deaths is the aim: two million people die from indoor air pollution every year; 1.2 from outdoor air pollution; 1.3 million from road traffic injuries.

TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE: http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=87224

The one thing depleting faster than oil is the credibility of those measuring it The challenge of feeding billions of people as fuel supplies fall is

The one thing depleting faster than oil is the credibility of those measuring it
The challenge of feeding billions of people as fuel supplies fall is staggering. And yet leaders' heads remain stuck in the sand
by George Monbiot
guardian.co.uk LINK TO FULL ARTICLE BELOW
Monday 16 November 2009


I don't know when global oil supplies will start to decline. I do know that another resource has already peaked and gone into free fall: the credibility of the body that's meant to assess them. Last week two whistleblowers from the International Energy Agency alleged that it has deliberately upgraded its estimate of the world's oil supplies in order not to frighten the markets. Three days later, a paper published by researchers at Uppsala University in Sweden showed that the IEA's forecasts must be wrong, because it assumes a rate of extraction that appears to be impossible. The agency's assessment of the state of global oil supplies is beginning to look as reliable as Alan Greenspan's blandishments about the health of the financial markets.

If the whistleblowers are right, we should be stockpiling ammunition. If we are taken by surprise, if we have failed to replace oil before the supply peaks then crashes, the global economy is stuffed. But nothing the whistle-blowers said has scared me as much as the conversation I had last week with a Pembrokeshire farmer.

Wyn Evans, who runs a mixed farm of 170 acres, has been trying to reduce his dependency on fossil fuels since 1977. He has installed an anaerobic digester, a wind turbine, solar panels and a ground-sourced heat pump. He has sought wherever possible to replace diesel with his own electricity. Instead of using his tractor to spread slurry, he pumps it from the digester on to nearby fields. He's replaced his tractor-driven irrigation system with an electric one, and set up a new system for drying hay indoors, which means he has to turn it in the field only once. Whatever else he does is likely to produce smaller savings. But these innovations have reduced his use of diesel by only around 25%.

Link to full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/16/oil-running-out-madman-sandwich-board

Captain Paul Watson Responds to Japan’s Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada

Captain Paul Watson Responds to Japan’s Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada
The Australian
December 11, 2009
Link to full article below

Question: The most frequent cause of diplomatic tension between Japan and Australia is over Japan's scientific whaling program. What is the Hatoyama government's policy view of scientific whaling and of supporting it by government subsidies and public loans and having the programme providing positions for former bureaucrats?

Katsuya Okada: First of all, with regards to this issue, I think we should try to discuss this issue in calm, not emotional way. Because our ancestors, we have a tradition here in Japan where we have been eating whale meat. Of course it would be a different story if it were endangered species which are on the verge of extinction. But if not, I think the average Japanese would like to consume whale meat into the future.

To read the full article: http://www.seashepherd.org/news-and-media/editorial-091210-1.html

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Please read: Global boiling declares war on Thanksgiving

Global boiling declares war on Thanksgiving
by Brad Johnson
19 Nov 2009 Link to full article below

Our increasingly extreme climate is devastating American agriculture. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, strengthened by global warming, caused $1.6 billion in agriculture damage in Louisiana alone. Now it appears that a Thanksgiving mainstay—pumpkin pie—is next on the global boiling hit list. On Tuesday, Nestle Baking, “which controls about 85 percent of the pumpkin crop for canning, issued a rare apology and said that rain appeared to have destroyed what remained of a small harvest this year and that it expected to stop shipping the holiday staple by Thanksgiving.” Paul Bakus, vice president and general manager of Nestle Baking, bemoaned the devastating rains that made it impossible to harvest the Morton, Illinois pumpkin crop used for Libby’s canned pumpkin:

If only we could have changed the weather. We hope Mother Nature is nicer to us next year, hopefully delivering less rain and more sunshine.

In addition, waffles are on the hit list, as supplies of Eggos are disappearing. “Heavy rains that soaked Atlanta last month knocked out Kellogg’s waffle operations,” ABC News reported on Tuesday. September’s epic flooding actually exacerbated a shutdown caused by an earlier virulent outbreak of the deadly bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. Kellogg’s initially only referred to the food poisoning threat as “equipment issues,” preferring to let global boiling take the blame.

Unfortunately, we have changed the weather.

“2009 continues to climb up the rainiest-years-ever chart” in Illinois.

Please read the full article: http://www.grist.org/article/2009-11-19-global-boiling-declares-war-on-thanksgiving

Friday, October 30, 2009

Global warming labels put on food products

Global warming labels put on food products
by JoAnn Blake
October 24, 2009 Link to full article below

When it comes to reducing emissions of climate-changing greenhouse gases, Swedes are downright serious. The New York Times reported on Friday that Sweden is testing the idea of labeling food to help reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.

The labeling effort grew out of a 2005 Swedish study that found 25 percent of national per capita emissions was attributable to eating. An example of the labeling: "Climate declared: .87 kg CO2 per kg of product," which relates to the amount of carbon dioxide involved in the food's production.

Among the recommendations of the nation's new food guidelines are to eat carrots rather than cucumbers and tomatoes (which are grown in heated greenhouses there, which consume energy) and to substitute beans or chicken for red meat because of the emissions associated with raising cattle.

To read the full article: http://www.examiner.com/x-12720-DC-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d24-Global-warming-labels-put-on-food-items

Simple lifestyle tweaks key in climate change fight

Simple lifestyle tweaks key in climate change fight
gence France-Presse
26 Oct 2009 Link to full article below

WASHINGTON—The United States could cut greenhouse gas emissions by the equivalent of France’s total annual emissions by getting Americans to make simple lifestyle changes, like regularly maintaining their cars or insulating their attics, a study showed Monday.

If U.S. households took 17 easy-to-implement actions—like switching to a fuel-efficient vehicle, drying laundry on a clothesline instead of in a dryer, or turning down the thermostat—carbon emissions could be cut by 123 metric tons a year by the 10th year, the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found [PDF].

“This amounts to ... 7.4 percent of total national emissions—an amount slightly larger than the total national emissions of France,” showed the study led by Thomas Dietz of Michigan State University’s department of sociology and environmental science and policy.

“It is greater than reducing to zero all emissions in the United States from the petroleum-refining, iron and steel, and aluminum industries, each of which is among the largest emitters in the industrial sector,” the study said.

But the lifestyle changes come with a much smaller price tag and no great change to the way Americans live.

To read the full article: http://www.grist.org/article/2009-10-26-simple-lifestyle-tweaks-key-in-climate-change-fight

Eating animals is making us sick

Eating animals is making us sick
By Jonathan Safran Foer, Special to CNN
October 28, 2009 Link to full article below

New York (CNN) -- Like most people, I'd given some thought to what meat actually is, but until I became a father and faced the prospect of having to make food choices on someone else's behalf, there was no urgency to get to the bottom of things.

I'm a novelist and never had it in mind to write nonfiction. Frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it again. But the subject of animal agriculture, at this moment, is something no one should ignore. As a writer, putting words on the page is how I pay attention.

If the way we raise animals for food isn't the most important problem in the world right now, it's arguably the No. 1 cause of global warming: The United Nations reports the livestock business generates more greenhouse gas emissions than all forms of transportation combined.

It's the No. 1 cause of animal suffering, a decisive factor in the creation of zoonotic diseases like bird and swine flu, and the list goes on. It is the problem with the most deafening silence surrounding it.

Even the most political people, the most thoughtful and engaged, tend not to "go there." And for good reason. Going there can be extremely uncomfortable. Food is not just what we put in our mouths to fill up; it is culture and identity. Reason plays some role in our decisions about food, but it's rarely driving the car.

We need a better way to talk about eating animals, a way that doesn't ignore or even just shruggingly accept things like habits, cravings, family and history but rather incorporates them into the conversation. The more they are allowed in, the more able we will be to follow our best instincts. And although there are many respectable ways to think about meat, there is not a person on Earth whose best instincts would lead him or her to factory farming.

My book, "Eating Animals," addresses factory farming from numerous perspectives: animal welfare, the environment, the price paid by rural communities, the economic costs.

Please read the full article: http://www.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/10/28/opinion.jonathan.foer/index.html

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Please read: Mauna Kea is a Microcosm for the World's Current Ecological Dilemmas

http://www.naturalnews.com/026899_Mauna_Kea_Hawaii_YouTube.html
******************************************************
If you enjoyed this, would you please make a donation?
Even $1 or $5 helps us to serve you.


Sunday, August 16, 2009

Goodbye Pools, Lawns and a Whole Lot More: Why Life in the Southwest as We Know it Will Be History


Goodbye Pools, Lawns and a Whole Lot More: Why Life in the Southwest as We Know it Will Be History
By Alex Steffen, Worldchanging
August 10, 2009 Link to full article below

This piece first appeared in Worldchanging.

It is likely to be a source of unhappiness for us that we have taken natural bounty for granted in designing our civilization. But it is likely to prove tragic that we have assumed not only the indestructibility of nature (heck, some fossils still argue that climate change is impossible because it is not within human abilities to wreck the climate), but also that the particularly beneficial circumstances of the 20th century are what is ecologically "normal." Nowhere is this more evident than in arid regions, and nowhere is it better studied than in the American Southwest.

There, in the deserts and mountains, we Americans have built huge cities, farms and ranches, and one of the world's leading tourism industries (think Vegas) predicated on the reliability of cheap, plentiful water. This was a mistake. Water in the very near future will be neither cheap nor plentiful, and much of the Southwest is destined for real trouble.

To read the full article:
http://www.alternet.org/story/141887/

******************************************************
If you enjoyed this, would you please make a donation?
Even $1 or $5 helps us to serve you.


Saturday, July 4, 2009

FL Keys ill-prepared for rising sea

Keys ill-prepared for rising sea
BY CAMMY CLARK cclark@MiamiHerald.com
Sun, Jun. 28, 2009 Link to full article below

Treasure salvors searching for an 18th-century wreck in the Florida Straits a few years ago made a fascinating but little noticed discovery.

Not buried treasure. Buried land.

Some 35 miles west of Key West, in 45 feet of water under a five-foot layer of dense mud lay an 8,500-year-old shoreline not unlike today's coast of the Florida Keys. There were well-preserved mangroves, pine cones and pine tree pieces, some amazingly still fragrant when brought to the surface.

'Looking at it, I was thinking: `Wow, this could be the shoreline of Big Pine Key,' '' said Corey Malcom, director of archaeology for the Mel Fisher Maritime Heritage Society.

The prehistoric past paints a sobering picture of what many experts see as an all-too-near future for the string of low-lying islands that make up the Florida Keys.

''South Florida is on the front line against sea-level rise in the United States, and the Florida Keys are ground zero,'' said Evan Flugman, who co-authored a Florida International University report on the importance of Monroe County tackling the issue now.

By 2100, under the best-case predictions of a seven-inch sea-level rise by an international climate panel, the Keys would lose about 59,000 acres of real estate worth $11 billion, according to the nonprofit Nature Conservancy.

Under the panel's worst-case projection of ocean waters rising 23.2 inches, about 75 percent of the Keys 154,000 acres and nearly 50 percent of its $43 billion property value could become submerged. Consequences also include the loss of habitat for many endangered plants and species, including Key deer.

And the panel's predictions are conservative in comparison to some scientists' calculations.

To read the full article: http://www.miamiherald.com/505/story/1118712.html

******************************************************
We are monks, & we offer these with love. If you enjoyed this,
would you please make a donation? Even $1 or $5 helps us to serve you.



Tuesday, June 30, 2009

10 Endangered Vacations

10 Endangered Vacations
Plan these trips now ... while you still can. (from dailygreen.com, link below)

Endangered Destinations Dot the Map

You've heard of the Life List -- the vacation spots you want to see before you die. This is a little different. These are top U.S. destinations you might want to see before they die. "They" being the destinations themselves. Each of these vacation ideas is located in a landscape that is threatened in some way -- whether by global warming, mining, extreme weather or by another environmental hazard.

While inclusion on this list isn't an indication that these sites are in imminent danger of disappearing, the fact that this list seems plausible is a distinctly 21st Century phenomenon. After all, destinations are supposed to be permanent, even though our lives are not -- that's what makes the Wonders of the World so mysterious and attractive. It's not just their beauty and scale, but their endurance.

In an era when our expanding population, and our expanding pollution keep expanding the human influence on the Earth, not all destinations are so permanent as they once seemed. (Even the Sphinx is crumbling, thanks in part to acid rain.) So in this year when gas prices are rising (again), jobs are scarce and budgets are tight, it may yet still be the time to take to the road and see one of these endangered U.S. destinations. You may have another chance, but your kids or their kids may not. (Better pack a camera.)

Photographing Glaciers in Glacier National Park
What would the Grand Canyon be without a canyon? Something like Glacier National Park would be without its glaciers. But by 2030, that's exactly the landscape that might greet visitors, as the climate warms.

Already, some of the most famous glaciers in the Montana park have shrunk by more than half, and only 17% of the glaciers found there in 1850 remain today (26 of 150). While the valleys below have warmed about 2 degrees in the last century, the peaks of Glacier National Park have warmed about 2 degrees every year for 15 years.

Glaciers are things of beauty and awe: the imprint of time and the Earth's physical processes represented in massive hulk of ice on the landscape. The loss of glaciers -- not just in U.S. national parks, but worldwide is one of the most visual signs of global warming. Sure, the melting of a glacier is still slow in human years, but the change in Glacier National Park is real and any child born today should see the park before he or she hits 20 -- because the glaciers might well be gone by then.

Viewing Austin's Congress Avenue Bridge Bat Colony
One of the most unlikely tourist destinations in the country, Austin's Congress Avenue Bridge bats nevertheless draw as many as 100,000 tourists every year. The bats themselves don't seem particularly vulnerable: Every evening through the summer, as many as 1.5 million Mexican free-tail bats emerge from their colony under the bridge and start eating moths and other insects. It's the largest urban bat colony in the world.

And, indeed, there aren't any well-publicized threats to this colony of bats. What there is, is a mysterious disease that has begun creeping across the U.S. and which has the potential to decimate bat populations across the continent. Identified first in New York caves in February 2007, the malady is known as white nose syndrome because its most recognizable symptom is a ring of white fungus on the noses of the bats found dead by the hundreds in caves where they hibernate through the winter. Scientists have since watched the disease infect caves throughout the Northeast and spread to at least nine states.

Bats are scary, gargoyle-like creatures, sure. But they eat bugs that we don't like, and -- just ask the tourism bureau in Austin, or farmers who rely on their natural pest-control abilities, or those who find strange beauty in their faces, wings and habits -- bats are worth keeping around. They remind us that losing any one piece of an ecosystem can lead to a cascade of unintended, and unwelcome changes.

At this point, scientists haven't been able to define the disease fully, identify its origins or devise any remedies. Will it reach the caves of the Southwestern U.S., Mexico and South America, where Mexican free-tail bats spend the winter? Who knows -- but you might want to see that awe-inspiring wildlife display in Austin now, just to make sure.

Whatever It Is That Happens in Vegas
What could possibly happen to Vegas (that hasn't already happened in Vegas)? This one might be a little overly apocalyptic for some, but step back for a minute and you'll remember that Las Vegas is built smack in the middle of the desert. It exists, not only to gleefully champion sin, but also because the Colorado River has been dammed, diverted and directed to flow into Lake Mead and other reservoirs, so that the dry Southwest can bloom beyond its natural limits.

But for how long? The flow of the Colorado River, one of the continent's mightiest, is already strained, the remnants of its abundant water flow disputed across the western U.S. Add a sprawling population, demanding drinking water and green lawns and farm-fresh produce, and the dwindling snowpack that feeds the river -- thanks to global warming -- and Las Vegas could face serious strains soon. By 2021, according to one study of Lake Mead, which supplies 90% of the city's drinking water.

The larger issue is how a growing population faces the limits of its environment. In the Southwest, engineering has been the solution -- dams, irrigation ditches and casinos being the most obvious examples of our dominance over an inhospitable landscape. Into the future, as global warming stresses our already thinly stretched resources, will it make sense to grow lush green lawns in the middle of the desert?

Vegas being what it is, the loss of water might not be a death knell. There is, after all, alcohol. Might be better to plan your visit before 2021 all the same.

Paddling the Florida Everglades
verglades National Park is the largest subtropical wilderness in the United States — a vast and slow-moving river channeled through tufts of dry land. It's teeming with wildlife, from the abundant and ferocious (alligators and crocodiles) to the scarce and ferocious (the panther) and every creature on down the food chain. Paddling a canoe through the Everglades is a rare experience.

Rare indeed. The Everglades face a Goldilocks-type question: Will there be too little water, too much ... or just the right amount? Too little and the Everglades dry up. Too much and it gets swallowed by the sea. Either way, it won’t offer the same wilderness canoe experience it does today.

For more than a century, too little water has been the problem, as agriculture and suburban sprawl have eaten into the swamp, draining and diverting the natural water flow. With the water has gone 90% of some populations of wading birds.

Water levels are rising, thanks to a 35-year preservation plan and billions of dollars in planned spending. But global warming could cause sea-level rise to swamp the swamp; the highest point in Everglades National Park is just eight feet above sea level, and the latest projections suggest there will be more than enough new sea water to cover that land in the next 100 years or so. The Everglades could be swallowed by the sea.

Bottom line: Better not put off that once-in-a-lifetime trip to this one-of-a-kind destination.

Wine Tasting in Napa Valley

To read the full article: http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/endangered-vacations-47060902?src=nl&mag=tdg&list=dgr&kw=ist

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Can vegetarians save the world?

Can vegetarians save the world?
Saturday, June 06, 2009



Environmentalists are making a big noise about how meat-free days can help reduce global warming. Kalpish Ratna wonders if vegetarians can indeed save the world.

Can vegetarianism save the world? I’m tempted to say yes, in light of our food crisis. One hundred and ten million people were driven into penury last year, 44 million of them went hungry most of the time, and an uncounted number, mostly women and children, starved to death.

Food prices will rise even more this year as crop yields fall with extreme climate change, and as more land is cultivated with crops we cannot eat. The food we do harvest is at the mercy of a corrupt system. How will the hungry access it?

It takes three kg of cereal to grow one kg of meat. Thirty percent of the planet’s arable land cultivates feed for its livestock. This means nearly half the cereal we grow is eaten by animals we will presently eat. These animals need to graze, so forests are cut down for pasturage.

Add to this the undeniable reality of several recent pandemics, having emerged solely as a result of unhealthy farming practices-BSE, SARS, avian flu and now swine flu-and the argument seems watertight. Turn vegetarian, and save the planet.

To read the full article: http://www.deccanherald.com/content/6606/can-vegetarians-save-world.html

Have it your way: Burger King franchise cites cockroaches and Oz in defence of 'global warming is baloney' signs

Have it your way: Burger King franchise cites cockroaches and Oz in defence of 'global warming is baloney' signs


Earlier this week we were, ahem, relishing the story about how some Burger King restaurants in Tennessee had been displaying signs saying "global warming is baloney".

A journalist working for the Memphis Flyer, a local news weekly, had photographed some of the signs and then approached Burger King's press office for an explanation. It responded by saying the sign's message didn't match the corporation's views on global warming and it said it had asked the franchise owner to take the signs down. End of story.

You would think so, but the story went viral and was quickly picked up across the globe. The story, with a little nudge from the Guardian's environment blog, had been supersized.

Within a day it had even featured on MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann (preceded, without a hint of irony it seems, by an advert for Applebee's burgers) with the host listing the franchise owner, a Memphis-based company called Mirabile Investment Corporation (MIC), in his "world's worst" slot.

Please read the full article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2009/jun/05/burger-king-climate-change-baloney
Related Posts with Thumbnails